Marlow v. E. L. Jones & Son, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[T]he burden of proving the relationship of employer and employee is upon the claimants.\
• “[T]he burden of proving the relationship of employer and employee is upon the claimants.”
• working partners are not employees and therefore not statutory employees
• working partners are not employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chavis v. Watkins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1971-04-13· cited 39×
• Tharpe v. G. E. Moore Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-05-12· cited 35×
• Dawkins v. Jordan
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-07-10· cited 20×
• Pilgrim v. Eaton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-12-15· cited 13×
• Daniels v. Roumillat
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-06-04· cited 10×
• Dawkins v. Capitol Construction Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1967-11-27· cited 9×
• Smith v. Squires Timber Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-04-05· cited 9×
• Lewis v. L.B. Dynasty
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-03-18· cited 8×
• Pilgrim v. Eaton
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-12-15· cited 2×
• Rader v. American Ass'n of Christian Schools
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1998-06-24· cited 1×
• Ramirez v. May River Roofing, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2021-06-02

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Allen v. Phinney Oil Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1962-10-01· cited 5×