Marlow v. AMR Services Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the ADA did pre-empt jetbridge mechanic's claims that he was discharged in violation of state whistleblower act and state public policy, allegedly for reporting health and safety violations
• finding that worker for jet bridge maintenance company had claims that were not too peripheral, and thus had the necessary “connection with or reference to” air carrier service to result in ADA preemption of his state whistleblower claims
• jetbridge maintenance supervisor’s claim under Hawaii Whistleblower’s Act preempted by ADA because the maintenance of jetbridges affects passenger boarding procedures, and boarding procedures constitute “services”
• jetbridge maintenance employee's claim under whistleblower statute preempted by ADA where he alleged he was fired for raising safety concerns
• ADA preempted suit against corporation that serviced and maintained jet bridges used at airports

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).