· 1/19/2001
Marlin v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics
Citations
- 236 F.3d 716
- 344 U.S. App. D.C. 349
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 685
- 2001 WL 43007
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the interiors of polling places are nonpublic forums
- interior of polling place a nonpublic forum because of \longstanding limitations on polling place speech\
- “That narrower regulations might be as effective or more so . . . does not invalidate the means . . . chosen.”
- “That narrower regulations might be as effective or more so . . . does not invalidate the means . . . chosen.”
- “That narrower regulations might be as effective or more so ... does not invalidate the means the District has chosen.”
- “The forum here, the interior of a polling place, is neither a traditional public forum nor a government- designated one. It is not available for general public discourse of any sort.” (citing Burson, 504 U.S. at 201-06)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garland, Henderson, Randolph
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.