Marla Ross v. Midwest Communications, Inc., D/B/A Wcco Television, Andy Greenspan and Al Austin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that identification of particular victim, details of her attack, and her knowledge were of unique credibility and persuasive force in story
• stating that “judges, acting with the benefit of hindsight, must resist the temptation to edit journalists aggressively” because “[e]xuberant judicial blue-penciling after-the-fact would blunt the quills of even the most honorable journalists”
• “Exuberant judicial blue-penciling after-the-fact would blunt the quills of even the most honorable journalists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).