Markup v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1170
Syllabus
After neither party timely objected to a Special Master's Report and Recommendation, the Court determined that there was no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the Report and Recommendation. The Court adopted the Report and Recommendation. The Court ordered Respondent to provide certain documents to Requester, as identified in the Report and Recommendation. The Court found that Requester was entitled to recover from Respondent the amount of the filing fee of twenty-five dollars and any other costs associated with the action that were incurred by Requester, excepting attorney fees.
Judges: Sheeran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.