Skip to main content

Marks v. State

Citations

  • 617 S.W.2d 250
  • 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1063

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that, even if a trial judge’s conduct had been a comment on an eyewitness’s credibility, the fact that two other eyewitnesses identified the appellant as the perpetrator offset any potential harm
  • holding there was no error when the defendant did not object and request an instruction to disregard the trial judge’s comment that he wanted to talk to a witness outside of the presence of the jury
  • instruction by trial judge to disregard comments made by him or her is generally sufficient to cure any error arising from his or her statements
  • instruction by trial judge to disregard comments made by him or her is generally sufficient to cure any error arising from his or her statements
  • instruction by trial judge to disregard comments made by him or her is generally sufficient to cure any error arising from his or her statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion, Davis, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

62 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.