Marks v. National Communications Ass'n, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff did not engage in protected activity where she made a failure-to-promote complaint to employer, arguing about her qualifications but never suggested gender-bias as motivation
• “Undue preoccupation with what female employees look like is not permissible under anti-discrimination laws if the same kind of attention is not paid to male employees.” (quoting Drinkwater v. Union Carbide Corp., 904 F.2d 853, 862–63 (3d Cir. 1990)
• applying prima facie case to plaintiffs “gender plus” claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).