Marks v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even if ERISA permitted [beneficiaries] a second bite at the apple [in federal court], Rooker-Feldman would snatch it from their grasp.”
• “[T]he court need not conduct a choice of law analysis because the parties have not conducted one or advocated for applicability of the law of a state other than Illinois, resulting in waiver of choice of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).