Marks v. LaBerge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a trial court concludes whether “a particular location is the person’s ‘dwelling house or usual place of abode’ based on the facts specific to that case”
• affirming denial of Rule 60(c)(6) relief where the court could reasonably infer the defendant “simply chose not to respond to the summons and complaint”
• affirming denial of Rule 60(c)(6) relief where the court could reasonably infer the defendant “simply chose not to respond to the summons and complaint”
• construing service rule’s reference to service at “dwelling house or usual place of abode” liberally where defendant receives actual notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).