Marks v. GLT Development Corp.
Citations
- 230 Conn. App. 871
Syllabus
The plaintiff appealed from the trial court's judgment granting the motion to strike filed by the defendant general contractor, G Co., with respect to a count of the complaint alleging negligence for an injury that occurred on May 24, 2020. The plaintiff claimed that the court improperly determined that the action was time barred pursuant to statute (§ 52-584). Held: The trial court properly concluded that the plaintiff's negligence claim against G Co. was time barred because it correctly determined, in accordance with Executive Order Nos. 7G and 10A, issued during the COVID-19 pan- demic, that the two year limitation period set forth in § 52-584, which had been suspended for a period of time during the pandemic, began to run on March 1, 2021, and expired on March 1, 2023, and it was undisputed that the plaintiff commenced the action on March 24, 2023. Argued February 4—officially released February 25, 2025
Judges: Moll; Seeley; Prescott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.