Marks v. First Nat. Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that party’s challenge to sufficiency of evidence was not preserved because party did not move for directed verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Frangos v. Edmunds
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1946-09-18· cited 58×
• Peiffer v. Hoyt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2005-12-30· cited 40×
• Jeffries v. Pankow
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1924-03-11· cited 24×
• Dahl & Penne, Inc. v. State Bank
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1924-02-13· cited 6×
• West v. Hedges
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1918-03-26· cited 4×
• Roseburg Nat. Bank v. Camp
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1919-09-09
• Rodgers v. Nationwide Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-08-18

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Shmit v. Day
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1895-04-01· cited 19×
• Stoddard Lumber Co. v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1917-05-29· cited 14×
• Pratt v. Union National Bank
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1909-12-23· cited 10×
• U. S. Nat. Bank v. First Trust & Savings Bank
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1911-12-05· cited 5×