Skip to main content
· 3/28/1997

Markovich v. Samson (In Re Markovich)

Citations

  • 207 B.R. 909
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 7158
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3480
  • 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 534
  • 1997 WL 229115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing such holdings as “the minority view” and holding that, under Supreme Court precedent, bankruptcy courts’ equitable powers are limited to the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code
  • “We agree with the bankruptcy court that it did not have the inherent equitable power to revoke a discharge outside the framework of § 727(d). The equity power of the bankruptcy court cannot be used to override specific statutory provisions in the Code,”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ryan, Jones, Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.