Markman v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recounting cases, vacating judgment on claims between aliens, and remanding for determination of defendant's state of incorporation
• Remanding case where “Plaintiff's counsel has not met the requisites of pleading or proving diversity jurisdiction.”
• “Here and elsewhere in this opinion, we cite to cases decided by summary order . . . only as facts rather than as precedents.”
• “[A] federal court has diversity jurisdiction over an interpleader action brought pursuant to the Rule so long as the stakeholder . . . is diverse from every claimant.”
• “[A] federal court has diversity jurisdiction over an interpleader action brought pursuant to the Rule so long as the stakeholder . . . is diverse from every claimant.”
• “[F]ederal courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over state law claims among aliens.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).