Markley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the culpability requirement did not apply to the aggravating circumstance of “serious bodily injury,” enhancing a battery to a Class C felony
• “‘[P]rohibited conduct’ and ‘element’ within IC 35- 41-2-2(d) are not synonymous. If the legislature had intended culpability to apply to every material element, the phrase ‘of the prohibited conduct’ would be superfluous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tyson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-08-06· cited 52×
• Johnson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1992-12-22· cited 18×
• Williford v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1991-05-16· cited 17×
• Owens v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-02-16· cited 16×
• Cory Lowden v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-03-10· cited 12×
• D.H. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-08-11· cited 9×
• Jose Maldonado-Morales v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-02-25· cited 4×
• Williford v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1991-09-11· cited 4×
• Lamont Hudgins v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-11-13
• Christopher L. Norfolk v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2019-11-06

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stowers v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 84×
• Debose v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-05-07· cited 67×
• Faught v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1979-06-22· cited 42×
• Ball v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1980-06-24· cited 23×