Skip to main content
· 1/6/1913

Markle v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Citations

  • 238 Pa. 353
  • 86 A. 204
  • 1913 Pa. LEXIS 971

Syllabus

<p>Negligence — Street railways — Passenger—Tripping on platform —Act of conductor — Nvidence—Nonsuit.</p> <p>In an action against a street railway company to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by a passenger by reason of the negligent act of the conductor of one of defendant’s cars in tripping her with his foot when she was about to leave the car, a nonsuit should be granted where the evidence went no further than to show that plaintiff had tripped over the conductor’s foot, without explaining how the accident happened, or establishing any negligence on the part of the conductor.</p>

Judges: Brown, Fell, Mestrezat, Moschzisker, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.