Markham v. Fogg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding appellate court should not substitute its judgment for that of trier of fact as long as there is competent substantial evidence
• holding appellate court “should not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact” as long as there is “competent, substantial evidence”
• finding that although evidence was conflicting, competent, substantial evidence was adduced at trial to support trial court’s findings and district court erred in reversing trial court on this point
• appellate court should not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact as long as there is competent substantial evidence
• “As long as there is competent, substantial evidence to buttress this finding, an appeals court should not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact.”
• “As long as there is competent, substantial evidence to buttress this finding, an appeals court should not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).