Skip to main content
· 2/7/1986

Marker International v. deBruler

Citations

  • 635 F. Supp. 986
  • 228 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 906
  • 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s argument that the addition of another word to the plaintiffs name removes the confusing similarity. “A defendant in a trademark infringement or unfair competition case cannot prevail by simply adding a word to the one it shares with the plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.