Markaj v. Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Brown’s motion to vacate the judgment on the basis of newly discovered evidence . . . was untimely as it was filed more than 18 months after the District Court entered judgment on December 16, 2004.”
• “Brown’s motion to vacate the judgment on the basis of newly discovered evidence . . . was untimely as it was filed more than 18 months after the District Court entered judgment on December 16, 2004.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).