MARK WILLIS BROWN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counseling memoranda, unlike a denial of promotion, did not constitute “materially adverse” employment action even though motivated by racial animus
• holding that supervisors’ alleged action of monitoring the plaintiff more closely than they monitored non-African American employees did not constitute “adverse employment actions” actionable under Title VII
• counseling memoranda, unlike denial of promotion, did not constitute “materially adverse” employment action even though motivated by racial animus
• counseling memoranda, unlike denial of promotion, did not constitute “materially adverse” employment action even though motivated by racial animus
• counseling memoranda, unlike denial of promotion, did not constitute \materially adverse\ employment action even though motivated by racial animus
• finding circumstantial evidence that employer knew that plaintiff-correction officer filed grievance when plaintiff was the only officer transferred to another cell block

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).