· 5/7/2014
Mark W. Hitz v. The State of Wyoming
Citations
- 2014 WY 58
- 323 P.3d 1104
- 2014 WL 1819044
- 2014 Wyo. LEXIS 64
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]f a motion to reduce a sentence is filed outside of the prescribed time limits, the district court is deprived of jurisdiction to hear the motion.”
- “Whether subject matter jurisdiction exists is a question of law [which] this Court reviews de novo.” (citing Kurtenbach v. State, 2012 WY 162, ¶ 10, 290 P.3d 1101, 1104 (Wyo. 2012), and Neidlinger v. State, 2010 WY 54, ¶ 8, 230 P.3d 306, 308 (Wyo. 2010))
- looking to substance of motion to determine jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kite, Hill, Burke, Fox, Waldrip
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.