Skip to main content
· 5/7/2014

Mark W. Hitz v. The State of Wyoming

Citations

  • 2014 WY 58
  • 323 P.3d 1104
  • 2014 WL 1819044
  • 2014 Wyo. LEXIS 64

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]f a motion to reduce a sentence is filed outside of the prescribed time limits, the district court is deprived of jurisdiction to hear the motion.”
  • “Whether subject matter jurisdiction exists is a question of law [which] this Court reviews de novo.” (citing Kurtenbach v. State, 2012 WY 162, ¶ 10, 290 P.3d 1101, 1104 (Wyo. 2012), and Neidlinger v. State, 2010 WY 54, ¶ 8, 230 P.3d 306, 308 (Wyo. 2010))
  • looking to substance of motion to determine jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kite, Hill, Burke, Fox, Waldrip

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.