Mark v. Merz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring express findings by Sex Offender Registry Board that support assigned sex offender classification level
• prohibiting SORB from classifying offender as level two unless \a public safety interest is served by public availability of [their] registration information\ [citation omitted]
• requiring SORB to make three findings by clear and convincing evidence to issue level two classification
• board must determine whether Internet access to offender's information might realistically serve to protect public against risk of offender committing new sexual offense
• risk of reoffense relating only to noncontact offenses, where victim not put in fear of bodily harm, unlikely to pose moderate degree of dangerousness
• Internet 4 Factor 28, supervision by probation or parole; factor 30, advanced age (here, considered with moderate weight

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).