Mark Shane Bishop v. Deputy Dale Glazier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that whether a constitutional right at issue was “clearly established” is a question of law for the court to decide
• explaining that whether a constitutional right at issue was “clearly established” is a question of law for the court to decide
• starting and ending its analysis of qualified immunity with the second prong of the analysis, the “clearly established right” determination
• starting and ending its analysis of qualified immunity with the second prong of the analysis, the “clearly established right” determination
• “While there is no requirement that the very action in question has previously been held unlawful, [a plaintiff] can succeed only if earlier cases give [the officer] fair warning that his alleged treatment of [the plaintiff] was unconstitutional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).