Mark Rollins v. Hart Security Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that a trial court is not required to state that an issue falls within its discretion when the record clearly shows it was perceived as such
• declining to award costs when the party failed to articulate why they were entitled to costs on appeal
• stating one of the \essential\ considerations for reviewing a discretionary decision is \[w]hether the trial court . . . correctly perceived the issue as one of discretion\
• “In these cases, the trial court is responsible for determining factual issues that exist with respect to this equitable remedy and for fashioning the equitable remedy.”
• “As a general principle, the trial court is granted broad discretion in fashioning equitable relief.” (citation omitted)
• “As a general principle, the trial court is granted broad discretion in fashioning equitable relief.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).