· 10/26/1984
Mark P. Maxfield v. United States Postal Service, San Francisco Bulk Mail Center
Citations
- 752 F.2d 433
- 55 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 807
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17327
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding plaintiff “made no showing that he has 27 been deprived of his property without due process” because he “has an adequate remedy at 28 law if withholding exceeds his tax liability”
- “Maxfield’s 22 assertion that he is exempt from paying income tax appears to be based solely on his 23 allegation that the income tax is unconstitutional. This claim is frivolous.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tang, Schroeder, Beezer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.