Skip to main content
· 10/26/1984

Mark P. Maxfield v. United States Postal Service, San Francisco Bulk Mail Center

Citations

  • 752 F.2d 433
  • 55 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 807
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17327

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding plaintiff “made no showing that he has 27 been deprived of his property without due process” because he “has an adequate remedy at 28 law if withholding exceeds his tax liability”
  • “Maxfield’s 22 assertion that he is exempt from paying income tax appears to be based solely on his 23 allegation that the income tax is unconstitutional. This claim is frivolous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tang, Schroeder, Beezer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.