Mark Nieters v. Brandon Holtan

Oral argument

• Argued

  31 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a breach of a collective bargaining agreement is most analogous to a \breach of contract claim\
• holding that disgorgement of secret profits as a remedy for breach of fiduciary duty is equitable in nature
• holding that a section 301 claim “is comparable to a breach of contract claim—a legal issue”
• concluding that because the employees, in order to recover from the union, had to prove violations of the collective-bargaining agreement, the claims presented legal issues
• holding that a breach of a collective bargaining agreement is most analogous to a “breach of contract claim”
• holding that remedy of backpay sought in duty of fair representation § 301 action is legal in nature, and that plaintiff is entitled to a jury trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).