Mark Medel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a letter rejecting whistleblower claims was a determination for purposes of section 7623(b)(4
• holding a Whistleblower Office letter constituted a determination where it stated that an award determination could not be made under sec. 7623(b)
• holding a Whistleblower Office letter constituted a determination where it stated that an award determination could not be made under sec. 7623(b)
• asserting jurisdiction under section 7623(b)(4) when the WBO issued a written notice that embodies a determination
• “[T]he name or label of a document does not control whether the document constitutes a determination.”
• a letter rejecting whistleblower claims was a determination for purposes of section 7623(b)(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).