Skip to main content
· 4/15/1996

Mark Hofkin v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company

Citations

  • 81 F.3d 365
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7994
  • 1996 WL 173515

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing district court’s grant of judgment as a matter of law following a jury trial for both breach of contract and bad faith claims
  • collecting cases from around the country, and noting that its construction of the statutory language on which the policy language was based was in accord with the vast majority of courts having passed on the issue
  • comparing N.Y. Ins. Law § 3216(d)(1)(E) to other statutes of limitations
  • \The disposition of this case rests upon our interpretation of the Provident policy's `Legal Actions' clause and `Proofs of Loss' clause.\
  • interpreting 40 Pa. Stat. § 753(A)(7)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stapleton, Scirica, Cowen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.