Mark GAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that when the findings regarding a claimant’s impairment are adequately reflected in the ALJ’s hypothetical questions to the vocational expert, the vocational expert’s testimony further supports the ALJ’s related determination
• finding an ALJ was not bound by clearly advantageous hypotheticals that were unestablished and conclusive
• “Counsel could have probed the witness about the source’s reliability and acceptance in the profession, but he did not do so, and now our assessment of such matters is effectively foreclosed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).