Mark G. Epstein Samuel C. Arsers, on Behalf of Themselves & All Others Similarly Situated v. Washington Energy Co. James A. Thorpe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in the context of a 12(b)(6) motion, “[a]ll allegations of 6 material fact are taken as true and construed in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs”
• rejecting Section 10(b) claims 6 on the basis of “Plaintiffs[‘] assert[ions] that Defendants failed to disclose: 1
• explaining 13 that in the context of a 12(b)(6) motion, “[a]ll allegations of material fact are taken as true and 14 construed in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs”
• “threadbare recitals of the elements of the cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements,” are not taken as true
• “[C]onclusory allegations of 24 law and unwarranted inferences are insufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss for failure to state a 25 claim.”
• “[C]onclusory allegations of law and unwarranted inferences are insufficient to defeat 8 a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).