MARK FIVE CONST. CO., INC. v. Gonzalez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an employee worked regularly when he worked on a project in Virginia for eight months
• affirming the commission’s determination that the “service” of appellant’s employees in Virginia was “regular” rather than “sporadic or irregular,” reasoning that “[cjredible evidence in the record supports the commission’s ruling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).