MARK Et Al. v. AGERTER

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because a motion in limine is a pretrial determination of the admissibility of evidence, the grant of a motion in limine excluding evidence is a judicial power which must be exercised with great care.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pneumo Abex, LLC v. Sheila Long
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2020-10-21
• Joseph Stockert v. Brydan Rogers
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-10-08
• State v. Michelle Wierson
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-06-25

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Forsyth County v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-03-07· cited 53×
• Brooks v. Cellin Manufacturing Co.
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1983-09-08· cited 26×
• Studard v. Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-12-05· cited 22×
• Russell v. PARKFORD MANAGEMENT CO., INC.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-11-02· cited 13×
• One Bluff Drive, LLC v. K. A. P., Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-11-21· cited 12×
• APAC-Georgia, Inc. v. Padgett
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-11-28· cited 10×
• McCorkle v. Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-08-22· cited 9×
• CNL APF Partners, LP v. Department of Transportation
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-12-30· cited 9×
• Housing Authority v. Younis
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-05-31· cited 3×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-11-21· cited 1×