Mark Campbell v. Andrew Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that 1,688 days from conclusion of trial to the CCA’s first and only decision was unreasonable
• holding that in the post-trial context, each time period is reviewed individually “because the reasons for the delay may be different at each stage and different parties are responsible for the timely completion of each segment”
• explaining that “less draconian” measures would, at least for the time being, be sufficient to “deter ... delays”
• explaining that “less draconian” measures would, at least for the time being, be sufficient to “deter . . . delays”
• noting that we apply “a more flexible review” of the CCA’s review period, “recognizing that it involves the exercise of [their] judicial decision-making authority”
• noting that we apply “a more flexible review” of the CCA’s review period, “recognizing that it involves the exercise of [their] judicial decision-making authority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).