Skip to main content
· 9/29/2006

Mark Boyce v. Soundview Technology Group, Inc. (Formerly Known as Wit Capital Group, Inc.), Docket No. 05-1685-Cv

Citations

  • 464 F.3d 376
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 24613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • instructing jury to “examine the totality of the circumstances at the time of termination and determine the inherent justice of the matter”
  • employing the abuse-of-discretion standard to review a district court’s evidentiary ruling
  • explaining the different methodologies for valuing publicly traded versus non-publicly traded stock
  • “[T]he test for admissibility of evidence concerning prospective damages is whether the evidence has any tendency to show their probable amount.”
  • “[A] plaintiff need only show a stable foundation for a reasonable estimate of damages to which he is entitled as a result of the breach.”
  • “[W]here the existence of damage is certain, and the only uncertainty is as to its amount, . . . the burden of uncertainty as to the amount of damage is upon the wrongdoer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oakes, Pooler, Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.