Mark Anthony Young v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there was sufficient evidence that a defendant knew an accomplice would use a gun and emphasizing that “the jury can ‘draw inferences . . . based on all the facts and circumstances of a crime’s commission’” (emphasis omitted) (quoting Rosemond, 572 U.S. at 78 n.9)
• reasonable suspicion to stop vehicle based on matching description from dispatch and “temporal and geographic proximity” to crime scene
• reasonable suspicion to stop a car based on “the temporal and geographic proximity of the car to the scene of the crime, the matching description of the vehicle, and the time of the stop”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).