Mark A. Wilson v. Teresa C. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to succeed, a plaintiff must prove that her employer believed she had a physical impairment that substantially limited one or more major life activities
• noting that to be a disability an “impairment’s impact must ... be permanent or long term.”
• affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment to employer because plaintiffs “evidence would not have permitted a reasonable jury to conclude that [he] was substantially limited in a major life activity”
• “if the symptoms of an impairment are brought on by a single workplace, such an impairment is not substantially limiting”
• “The possibility that a jury might speculate in the plaintiff’s favor is insufficient to defeat summary judgment.”
• “The possibility that a jury might speculate in the plaintiff’s favor is insufficient to defeat summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).