Skip to main content
· 11/12/1980

Mark A. Allen v. Central Intelligence Agency

Citations

  • 636 F.2d 1287
  • 205 U.S. App. D.C. 159
  • 6 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2396
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 12400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that \court[s] not infrequently find[ ] it necessary to conduct in camera inspection\ when \utilization of [other procedures] has not proven fruitful\
  • “Where there is evidence of bad faith on the part of the agency____ [i]n camera inspection is ‘plainly necessary____’ ”
  • \Sufficiently detailed justifications [in public affidavits] for the agency's withholding is often impossible * * * because such justifications would reveal the very information sought to be protected.\
  • “where the agency affidavits merely parrot the language of the statute and are drawn in conclusory terms, the court’s responsibility to conduct de novo review is frustrated”
  • government must be afforded opportunity to justify nondisclosure before court undertakes in camera in-' spection
  • considerations bearing on resort to in camera inspection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Mikva, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.