· 11/12/1980
Mark A. Allen v. Central Intelligence Agency
Citations
- 636 F.2d 1287
- 205 U.S. App. D.C. 159
- 6 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2396
- 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 12400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that \court[s] not infrequently find[ ] it necessary to conduct in camera inspection\ when \utilization of [other procedures] has not proven fruitful\
- “Where there is evidence of bad faith on the part of the agency____ [i]n camera inspection is ‘plainly necessary____’ ”
- \Sufficiently detailed justifications [in public affidavits] for the agency's withholding is often impossible * * * because such justifications would reveal the very information sought to be protected.\
- “where the agency affidavits merely parrot the language of the statute and are drawn in conclusory terms, the court’s responsibility to conduct de novo review is frustrated”
- government must be afforded opportunity to justify nondisclosure before court undertakes in camera in-' spection
- considerations bearing on resort to in camera inspection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Mikva, Wright
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.