Marjorie O'DOnnell v. Georgia Osteopathic Hospital, Inc., D/B/A Doctors Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implying that both of plaintiff's claims were properly submitted to the jury because plaintiff had shown that age was a determining factor in defendant’s decisions regarding plaintiff's job placement
• explaining that the disclosure requirements of Rule 26(e)(2) prevent parties from becoming “prejudicially surprised” by evidence and testimony and from going through a “trial by ambush” (first quoting Shelak v. White Motor Co., 581 F.2d 1155, 1159 (5th Cir. 1978
• local rule establishing specific time limit for filing motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 would not be construed as limiting the time for application for fees under ADEA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).