Marion v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s fingerprints atthe scene of the crime, which were otherwise unexplained, combined with circumstantial evidence was sufficient to support burglary conviction
• holding that defendant’s fingerprints at the scene of the crime, which were otherwise unexplained, combined with circumstantial evidence was sufficient to support burglary conviction
• holding that defendant’s fingerprints at the scene of the crime, which were otherwise unexplained, and evidence of defendant’s prior commission of similar crimes were sufficient to support burglary conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Roberts v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-05-26· cited 10×
• Stokes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-06-11· cited 1×
• Jimmie Lee Stokes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-06-11

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Barnett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-02-12· cited 42×
• Tyler v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-02-22· cited 20×
• Ross v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-05-03· cited 7×
• Kier v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-03-13· cited 3×