Skip to main content
· 12/8/2003

Marion P. Fry, Dr. v. Drug Enforcement Agency

Citations

  • 353 F.3d 1041
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10497
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 24628
  • 2003 WL 22881754

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Evidence that a petitioner could have introduced at the time of the initial decision “is not ‘new’ evidence.”
  • agency decision is not arbitrary and capricious if “based on a consideration of the relevant factors and there is no clear error of judgment” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Beam, Paez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.