MARIO ARCE AND MARLENE ARCE v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that commercial speech has a limited measure of protection commensurate with its subordinate position in the scale of First Amendment values
• holding that \the State does not lose its power to regulate commercial activity deemed harmful to the public whenever speech is a component of that activity\
• holding that an attorney’s solicitation of clients, though entitled to some constitutional protection, was nevertheless subject to state regulation
• holding that an attorney's solicitation of clients, though entitled to some constitutional protection, was nevertheless subject to state regulation
• holding that the state has an important interest in preventing solicitation by lawyers that involves undue influence, intimidation, overreaching, and other forms of \vexatious conduct\
• concluding that this form of speech deserves a less searching form of constitutional scrutiny because of the longstanding state regulation of this type of expressive content

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).