Marino v. Drug Enforcement Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if a DOJ prosecutor introduces certain records as evidence in court, other DOJ components may not invoke a FOIA exemption as to those records
• holding that a prior disclosure by a federal prosecutor in court waived the DEA’s Glomar response because the federal prosecutor and the DEA are both part of the DOJ
• holding that a prior disclosure by a federal prosecutor in court waived the DEA's Glomar response because the federal prosecutor and the DEA are both part of the DOJ
• recognizing that information released in court by federal prosecutors constitutes a disclosure of DEA
• explaining that the public-domain doctrine does not apply “when someone other than the agency from which the information is being sought discloses it” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• observing that one way to put forward a \meritorious defense\ is by disputing facts on a motion for summary judgment and showing \with only a hint of a suggestions that key facts in the record aren't yet entirely clear\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).