· 8/11/1982
Marino Industries Corp., Cross-Appellee v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Cross-Appellant
Citations
- 686 F.2d 112
- 34 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 637
- 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16674
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that under New York law “[t]he corollary to the rule of strict compliance is that the requirements in letters of credit must be explicit, [ ... ] and that all ambiguities are construed against the bank”
- all ambiguities construed against the issuing bank in an action for wrongful dishonor by the beneficiary
- “Since the beneficiary must comply strictly with the requirements of the letter, it must know precisely and unequivocally what those requirements are.”
- “The corollary to the rule of strict compliance is that the requirements in letters of credit must be explicit.”
- requirements for payment must be specified “precisely and clearly”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lumbard, Oakes, Friedman, Claims
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.