Skip to main content
· 8/11/1982

Marino Industries Corp., Cross-Appellee v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., Cross-Appellant

Citations

  • 686 F.2d 112
  • 34 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 637
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that under New York law “[t]he corollary to the rule of strict compliance is that the requirements in letters of credit must be explicit, [ ... ] and that all ambiguities are construed against the bank”
  • all ambiguities construed against the issuing bank in an action for wrongful dishonor by the beneficiary
  • “Since the beneficiary must comply strictly with the requirements of the letter, it must know precisely and unequivocally what those requirements are.”
  • “The corollary to the rule of strict compliance is that the requirements in letters of credit must be explicit.”
  • requirements for payment must be specified “precisely and clearly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumbard, Oakes, Friedman, Claims

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.