Mariner Healthcare, Inc. v. Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that undefined term in alleged promise was too vague and indefinite for promissory estoppel to apply
• concluding that a promise that the terms and conditions of a previous lease would continue so long as the parties “continued to negotiate” the terms of a new lease was vague because “the parties did not attempt to define what would constitute continuing to negotiate”
• “Promissory estoppel does not apply to a promise that is vague, indefinite, or of uncertain duration.”
• “[w]here there are multiple defendants, venue is proper in any county where one of the defendants may be sued”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).