Skip to main content
· 5/19/1994

Marinelli v. Human Rights Commission

Citations

  • 634 N.E.2d 463
  • 262 Ill. App. 3d 247
  • 199 Ill. Dec. 624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence that employer did not treat complainant differently from her similarly situated younger coworker justified dismissal of age discrimination charge for lack of substantial evidence
  • employee's prior good performance evaluations did not refute fact that employee's performance immediately prior to termination was deficient
  • evidence that employer did not treat complainant differently from her similarly situated younger co-worker justified dismissal of age discrimination charge for lack of substantial evidence
  • “It is the decision of the Commission, not the Department, which we review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAREN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.