· 5/19/1994
Marinelli v. Human Rights Commission
Citations
- 634 N.E.2d 463
- 262 Ill. App. 3d 247
- 199 Ill. Dec. 624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence that employer did not treat complainant differently from her similarly situated younger coworker justified dismissal of age discrimination charge for lack of substantial evidence
- employee's prior good performance evaluations did not refute fact that employee's performance immediately prior to termination was deficient
- evidence that employer did not treat complainant differently from her similarly situated younger co-worker justified dismissal of age discrimination charge for lack of substantial evidence
- “It is the decision of the Commission, not the Department, which we review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McLAREN
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.