Skip to main content
· 1/21/1985

Marine Power & Equipment Co. v. Human Rights Commission Hearing Tribunal

Citations

  • 694 P.2d 697
  • 39 Wash. App. 609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a separation of powers challenge to an amendment that provided a remedy that the courts had not previously recognized
  • rejecting a separation of powers challenge to an amendment that provided a remedy that the courts had not previously recognized
  • when controlling law changes between the entering of judgment below and consideration of matter on appeal, appellate court should apply new or altered law
  • “The Legislature may not, under the guise of clarification, overrule by legislative enactment a prior authoritative Supreme Court opinion construing a statute.”
  • when controlling law changes between the entering of judgment below and consideration of matter on appeal, appellate court generally should apply new or altered law
  • when controlling law changes between the entering of judgment below and consideration of matter on appeal, appellate court should apply new or altered law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.