Skip to main content
· 2/11/1974

Marine Midland Bank-Eastern National Ass'n v. Conerty Pontiac-Buick, Inc.

Citations

  • 77 Misc. 2d 311
  • 352 N.Y.S.2d 953
  • 14 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 814
  • 1974 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1128

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that prior ex- press permission may be amenable to class-wide proof when given through uniform means
  • observing that prior ex- press permission may be amenable to class-wide proof when given through uniform means
  • “it is the method of determining the answer and not the answer itself that drives the predominance consideration”
  • \The Rule 23(b)(3) predominance requirement inherently requires the court to engage with the merits of the case . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mahoney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.