· 7/21/2025

Marinakis v. Marinakis

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2554

Syllabus

A probate court does not abuse its discretion solely by ordering payment of guardian ad litem fees without first satisfying the procedural requirements of a local rule related to fee payment where enforcement of the local rule is discretionary and there is no resulting prejudice. In ordering payment of guardian ad litem fees, a probate court need not always distinguish between traditional guardian ad litem services and legal services rendered by an attorney-guardian ad litem even in the absence of an express dual appointment as these roles may necessarily overlap. A probate court's decision to authorize contemporary payment of guardian ad litem fees falls well within its broad discretion to manage estate administration.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.