Skip to main content
· 4/22/2020

Marin, Jaime

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[b]ecause . . . Centimark should have known of the current violative condition, [the board] did not err in classifying the violations as ‘serious’ ”
  • analyzing inspection of corporation under both the Fourth Amendment and article I, section 7
  • analyzing inspection of corporation under both the Fourth Amendment and article I, section 7

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.