Marilyn Marshall v. Edward Johnson

Oral argument

• Argued

  21 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that FERC’s authority to act within its statutory scope of jurisdiction “may, of course, impinge as a practical matter on the behavior of non-jurisdictional” entities
• observing that FERC’s authority to act within its statutory scope of jurisdiction “may, of course, impinge as a practical matter on the behavior of non-jurisdictional” entities
• “FERC’s interpretations of the jurisdictional provisions of the Federal Power Act ... enjoy Chevron deference.” (citation omitted)
• agency is not “weaponless against conduct that might encourage or cloak the running up of unreasonable costs”
• “costs are to be allocated to those who cause the costs to be incurred and reap the resulting benefits”
• agency is not “weaponless against conduct that might encourage or cloak the running up of unreasonable costs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).