Skip to main content
· 6/13/1979

Federal Case

Citations

  • 594 F.2d 1051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • warning must be in form reasonably expected to catch attention of reasonably prudent person under circumstances
  • “The court should have granted the motion in limine” excluding evidence of marijuana smoking where its relevance was “tenuous at most” to the issue before the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.